Protecting the Welfare State: A Cautionary Tale from the UK to Iceland Ian McDonald skrifar 25. júlí 2023 10:01 I write the following as a response to Bjarni Benediktsson stating that he wants to continue the sale of Íslandsbanki, in addition to the privatisation of many other state-owned institutions. As a concerned citizen who fled the UK seven years ago to escape the tragic consequences of rampant privatisation, I feel compelled to raise the alarm as I witness a familiar pattern emerging in Iceland. Privatisation, with its potential to devastate once-strong welfare states, is a deeply concerning issue that must be addressed and rectified before it's too late. The lessons learned from my home country's mistakes should serve as a stark warning to Iceland and other nations tempted by the siren song of profit-driven governance. The United Kingdom, once renowned for its robust welfare state, found itself in the clutches of an ideology that prioritized profit over people. The relentless push for privatisation stripped vital public services, such as healthcare, education, and transportation, from the hands of the government and placed them into the control of private entities, often to disastrous effect. The consequences were felt deeply by the most vulnerable members of society, as these changes disproportionately impacted low-income families and the marginalized. The British experience with privatisation revealed that when essential services are subject to the whims of the free market, the primary focus becomes maximizing shareholder returns rather than ensuring the well-being and happiness of the population. The human cost of this shift was nothing short of devastating. Critical services, once considered sacrosanct, were plagued by inefficiencies, reduced accessibility, and inflated costs. Privatised institutions became less accountable to the public and more beholden to shareholders, leaving citizens voiceless and at the mercy of profit-driven motives. I am filled with apprehension as I see Iceland seemingly falling into the same trap. If the same pattern of privatisation is repeating itself in this country, there is a real danger of witnessing the erosion of the strong welfare state that has long been a source of pride for Icelanders. The cherished social safety net, which has provided care and support to those in need, is at risk of being torn apart and auctioned off to the highest bidder. It is essential for Icelanders to heed the warnings from across the ocean and reflect on the mistakes made in the UK. Consider who stands to benefit from these changes, and who will be left behind? Can we guarantee that essential services will remain accessible and affordable for all citizens? How can we ensure that profit motives do not supersede the public interest? Rather than blindly following the path of privatisation, Iceland has the opportunity to take a different route—one that prioritises collective well-being, inclusivity, and a commitment to strengthening its welfare state. This means exploring innovative ways to improve public services, enhancing efficiency, and seeking alternative solutions that place people rather than profit at the heart of decision-making. As an outsider looking in, I implore Icelanders not to let history repeat itself. Learn from the mistakes of others, stand together to protect the foundations of the country, and ensure that the interests of the people remain at the forefront of any policy decision. Only through unity and a commitment to shared values can Iceland forge a path that leads to a brighter, fairer, and more prosperous future for all its citizens. Let us avoid the nightmare that comes with the ruins of privatisation, and instead, build a society where compassion, solidarity, and a strong welfare state are cherished and preserved. Sjálfstæðisflokkurin, and Bjarni Benediktsson more specifically, are fully, idealogically comitted to the privatisation and sale of as many cherished and important Icelandic institutions as possible, in as short a time as possible. The recent interview in which Bjarni Benediktsson laid out his hopes and plans was not accidental. It was perfectly calculated. If this goes to pass, he gets what he wants and privatises huge swathes of Iceland, he will point to this interview and say "...well I did warn you..." Do not ignore this warning, or forget about it in the next news cycle. An ideological project is ongoing, and it is the duty of Icelanders to stop it. I just hope that they do before it is too late. The author is a member of Efling Union. Viltu birta grein á Vísi? Kynntu þér reglur ritstjórnar um skoðanagreinar. Senda grein Ian McDonald Mest lesið Ekki í okkar nafni Hópur félagsmanna Samfylkingarinnar og óflokksbundið jafnaðarfólk Skoðun Við viljum ekki ölmusu, við viljum fá að koma heim Dagmar Valsdóttir Skoðun Árnar eru ekki hreinsistöð fyrir sjókvíaeldi Brynjar Arnason Skoðun Við þurfum ekki ESB – eða hvað? Þorvaldur Ingi Jónsson Skoðun Eyja með stöðugt gengi, lítið atvinnuleysi og lága húsnæðisvexti Svanborg Sigmarsdóttir Skoðun Misskilningur: RÚV, Silfrið og meint hlutdrægni Hjörvar Sigurðsson Skoðun Hinn sjö mánaða Sam Fahd Abu Haikal Sveinn Þórhallsson Skoðun Hverjir borga brúsann? Franklín Ernir Kristjánsson Skoðun Mannúðin sett í varðhald í brottfararbúðum Rósa Björk Brynjólfsdóttir Skoðun Þarf vinnuskóli að vera vesen? Íris Róbertsdóttir Skoðun Skoðun Skoðun Að gefast upp Haraldur Eiríksson skrifar Skoðun Draghi-skýrslan og Ísland: framleiðni, samkeppnishæfni og kostnaður krónunnar Baldur Pétursson skrifar Skoðun Við þurfum ekki ESB – eða hvað? Þorvaldur Ingi Jónsson skrifar Skoðun Það er verið að efla framhaldsskóla og verkmenntun Sigurjón Þórðarson skrifar Skoðun Fullveldið er undirstaða sveigjanleikans: Hvers vegna EES-samstarfið dugar okkur Kristinn Karl Brynjarsson skrifar Skoðun Seiðkarlar fyrri alda Steingrímur Gunnarsson skrifar Skoðun Hverjir borga brúsann? Franklín Ernir Kristjánsson skrifar Skoðun Þegar rekstrarkröfur grafa undan faglegu starfi í þverfaglegri endurhæfingu Gunnhildur L. Marteinsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Hvað varð um gangbrautirnar? Valerio Gargiulo skrifar Skoðun Misskilningur: RÚV, Silfrið og meint hlutdrægni Hjörvar Sigurðsson skrifar Skoðun Árnar eru ekki hreinsistöð fyrir sjókvíaeldi Brynjar Arnason skrifar Skoðun Þarf vinnuskóli að vera vesen? Íris Róbertsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Djarfar senur klipptar út Elías Blöndal Guðjónsson skrifar Skoðun Hinn sjö mánaða Sam Fahd Abu Haikal Sveinn Þórhallsson skrifar Skoðun Eyja með stöðugt gengi, lítið atvinnuleysi og lága húsnæðisvexti Svanborg Sigmarsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Við viljum ekki ölmusu, við viljum fá að koma heim Dagmar Valsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Ekki í okkar nafni Hópur félagsmanna Samfylkingarinnar og óflokksbundið jafnaðarfólk skrifar Skoðun Mannúðin sett í varðhald í brottfararbúðum Rósa Björk Brynjólfsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Óuppfyllt loforð í húsnæðismálum í Kópavogi Eydís Inga Valsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Ísland vísar veginn í beinni nýtingu jarðhita Nótt Thorberg skrifar Skoðun Gjafakvótakerfið sem ráðherra Viðreisnar vill ekki kannast við Jón Kaldal skrifar Skoðun Hvað á að gera við afa? Stefanía Fanney Björgvinsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Vandræðagangur ráðuneytis við kerfisbreytingar setur þingnefnd í vanda Leifur Þorkelsson skrifar Skoðun Hugleiðingar um heimili fyrir færniskert fólk á ýmsum aldri Sigrún Huld Þorgrímsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Verðbólga eða atvinnuleysi, hvort viltu frekar? Elliði Vignisson skrifar Skoðun Um brottfararstöð og vistun barna Grímur Grímsson,Víðir Reynisson,Sandra Sigurðardóttir,Kolbrún Áslaugar Baldursdóttir,Guðmundur Ari Sigurjónsson skrifar Skoðun Kæru landar – af hverju eigum við að segja nei í ágúst? Þorvaldur Ingi Jónsson skrifar Skoðun Stöðugleiki eða sveigjanleiki Sigurjón Njarðarson skrifar Skoðun Lágt atvinnuleysi? Lítum á tölurnar Halldór Jörgen Olesen skrifar Skoðun Nýtt kvótakerfi í sjókvíaeldi — á kostnað landeigenda og veiðiréttarhafa Jóhann Helgi Stefánsson skrifar Sjá meira
I write the following as a response to Bjarni Benediktsson stating that he wants to continue the sale of Íslandsbanki, in addition to the privatisation of many other state-owned institutions. As a concerned citizen who fled the UK seven years ago to escape the tragic consequences of rampant privatisation, I feel compelled to raise the alarm as I witness a familiar pattern emerging in Iceland. Privatisation, with its potential to devastate once-strong welfare states, is a deeply concerning issue that must be addressed and rectified before it's too late. The lessons learned from my home country's mistakes should serve as a stark warning to Iceland and other nations tempted by the siren song of profit-driven governance. The United Kingdom, once renowned for its robust welfare state, found itself in the clutches of an ideology that prioritized profit over people. The relentless push for privatisation stripped vital public services, such as healthcare, education, and transportation, from the hands of the government and placed them into the control of private entities, often to disastrous effect. The consequences were felt deeply by the most vulnerable members of society, as these changes disproportionately impacted low-income families and the marginalized. The British experience with privatisation revealed that when essential services are subject to the whims of the free market, the primary focus becomes maximizing shareholder returns rather than ensuring the well-being and happiness of the population. The human cost of this shift was nothing short of devastating. Critical services, once considered sacrosanct, were plagued by inefficiencies, reduced accessibility, and inflated costs. Privatised institutions became less accountable to the public and more beholden to shareholders, leaving citizens voiceless and at the mercy of profit-driven motives. I am filled with apprehension as I see Iceland seemingly falling into the same trap. If the same pattern of privatisation is repeating itself in this country, there is a real danger of witnessing the erosion of the strong welfare state that has long been a source of pride for Icelanders. The cherished social safety net, which has provided care and support to those in need, is at risk of being torn apart and auctioned off to the highest bidder. It is essential for Icelanders to heed the warnings from across the ocean and reflect on the mistakes made in the UK. Consider who stands to benefit from these changes, and who will be left behind? Can we guarantee that essential services will remain accessible and affordable for all citizens? How can we ensure that profit motives do not supersede the public interest? Rather than blindly following the path of privatisation, Iceland has the opportunity to take a different route—one that prioritises collective well-being, inclusivity, and a commitment to strengthening its welfare state. This means exploring innovative ways to improve public services, enhancing efficiency, and seeking alternative solutions that place people rather than profit at the heart of decision-making. As an outsider looking in, I implore Icelanders not to let history repeat itself. Learn from the mistakes of others, stand together to protect the foundations of the country, and ensure that the interests of the people remain at the forefront of any policy decision. Only through unity and a commitment to shared values can Iceland forge a path that leads to a brighter, fairer, and more prosperous future for all its citizens. Let us avoid the nightmare that comes with the ruins of privatisation, and instead, build a society where compassion, solidarity, and a strong welfare state are cherished and preserved. Sjálfstæðisflokkurin, and Bjarni Benediktsson more specifically, are fully, idealogically comitted to the privatisation and sale of as many cherished and important Icelandic institutions as possible, in as short a time as possible. The recent interview in which Bjarni Benediktsson laid out his hopes and plans was not accidental. It was perfectly calculated. If this goes to pass, he gets what he wants and privatises huge swathes of Iceland, he will point to this interview and say "...well I did warn you..." Do not ignore this warning, or forget about it in the next news cycle. An ideological project is ongoing, and it is the duty of Icelanders to stop it. I just hope that they do before it is too late. The author is a member of Efling Union.
Skoðun Draghi-skýrslan og Ísland: framleiðni, samkeppnishæfni og kostnaður krónunnar Baldur Pétursson skrifar
Skoðun Fullveldið er undirstaða sveigjanleikans: Hvers vegna EES-samstarfið dugar okkur Kristinn Karl Brynjarsson skrifar
Skoðun Þegar rekstrarkröfur grafa undan faglegu starfi í þverfaglegri endurhæfingu Gunnhildur L. Marteinsdóttir skrifar
Skoðun Eyja með stöðugt gengi, lítið atvinnuleysi og lága húsnæðisvexti Svanborg Sigmarsdóttir skrifar
Skoðun Vandræðagangur ráðuneytis við kerfisbreytingar setur þingnefnd í vanda Leifur Þorkelsson skrifar
Skoðun Hugleiðingar um heimili fyrir færniskert fólk á ýmsum aldri Sigrún Huld Þorgrímsdóttir skrifar
Skoðun Um brottfararstöð og vistun barna Grímur Grímsson,Víðir Reynisson,Sandra Sigurðardóttir,Kolbrún Áslaugar Baldursdóttir,Guðmundur Ari Sigurjónsson skrifar
Skoðun Nýtt kvótakerfi í sjókvíaeldi — á kostnað landeigenda og veiðiréttarhafa Jóhann Helgi Stefánsson skrifar